|
Post by sturgeon on Oct 26, 2022 15:41:41 GMT
Two buddies party Seth Rogen-style in Vietnam.
Sometimes the doctrines taught in Creative Writing pedagogy feel stifling, like "show don't tell" and "abolish the adverbs". But then I read a cap like this and remember why they're so important. Is there such a word as adverb-arrhoea? I'm confident that this cap would be improved by cutting every single adverb.
Improved, yes, but from a low bar. Let me level with you, I strongly disliked this cap. It had - and I quote from the cap itself - "the feel of poorly scripted reality tv." But more sinister than that, it had the feel of dog whistle politics, of cultural imperialism, and all the isms that us leftie liberal snowflakes get so oversensitive about. Freddy had the gall to lecture the protagonist about his entrenched cultural biases, despite his most profound insight about the culture being "Ooh, look how weird Vietnam is." I kept holding out for a sign that this cap was being self-aware, ironic, clever - but its final scene only served to convince me that this was a poorly conceived male white-supremacist fantasy.
If the cap was designed to make me feel like it condemned the behaviour and attitude of its characters - or that the protagonist's half-hearted resistance was a sign of hope for moral redemption - it failed.
An emphatic no.
|
|
|
Post by rorschalk on Oct 26, 2022 16:44:16 GMT
Sturge,
You're a fish, not a snowflake. TQR wants objective reasons for its capital discriminations, not indignant disavowal of the latest grievance generator toward white males, "white supremacy" itself a dog whistle for "Your shit doesn't matter whitey. Sit down and shut up." Yes, we all have our personal biases, but TQR was created to rise above our petty differences. Could you possibly redo this critique from the perspective of a world broader than one political party? I think we owe that to the VC.
|
|
|
Post by bulldust on Oct 26, 2022 20:05:06 GMT
Moo, moo moo moo moo! The Bull is not to be fucked with this week. This is a warning. Screw with the Bulldog and get gored, motherfuckers.
The Bull is not a snowflake but a force of raging anger and will approach this cap with an objective eye.
No sir. He did not like it.
It was like a slice of life from a couple of bros who were too pathetic to be getting any poontang from 'Merican bitches so they had to shit on some other country's hoes. But that wasn't the only problem with the cap. It really had no point. There was no conflict, no emotional crisis of any note. Just a couple of bro-dudes who want a rub and tug in a place they deemed themselves culturally superior to.
Seriously, there is nothing to empathize with here. These fuckwits are the types to wear white New Balance sneakers with jeans and their Rocky t-shirts in the middle of Hanoi while looking for some hot bitch action but drunkenly banging some katoeys then waking in shame with greased up assholes.
This cap is devoid of any substance.
So no.
|
|
|
Post by sturgeon on Oct 26, 2022 20:34:29 GMT
Sturge,
You're a fish, not a snowflake. TQR wants objective reasons for its capital discriminations, not indignant disavowal of the latest grievance generator toward white males, "white supremacy" itself a dog whistle for "Your shit doesn't matter whitey. Sit down and shut up." Yes, we all have our personal biases, but TQR was created to rise above our petty differences. Could you possibly redo this critique from the perspective of a world broader than one political party? I think we owe that to the VC. Do my personal biases impact my opinion of a cap? Yes, of course they do. Any editor pretending otherwise is lying.
Would I have been just as harsh on an unironically preachy piece of liberal disquisition? Yes, of course I would.
My point is not that I disagree with the politics of this cap, but that I do not see what this cap is trying to achieve, beyond preaching politics. The characters debate the morality of American versus Vietnamese culture - but without any real insight into either, preferring instead to lean into stereotypes.
Freddy is an arrogant and unlikeable character, the protagonist is presented as weak and naïve, and the Vietnamese characters are merely backdrop; ciphers. The characters did not face a dramatic enough conflict/crisis to compel me to wonder whether they would change/grow/survive by the end. I felt no sense of wonder about a land and culture with which I was previously unfamiliar. Unless I missed it (which is always possible), this cap contains no irony, no hidden metaphor. And it did not make me laugh. Character, drama, wonder, metaphor, larks - why else do we invest?
I have been very harsh, but as I say, I didn't like it. May the VC take this critique as a challenge rather than an assassination.
|
|
|
Post by rorschalk on Oct 26, 2022 20:35:32 GMT
Bravo, sir! That is critique gold for which the VC will, if he is savvy, greatly benefit from. Thank you.
|
|